David Woolven to
me, Chris, glynn
show details Oct 27, 2009
Dear Mr Hines
Many thanks for your reply.
I am not at this moment prepared to remove your articles from our website.
As proven, we gained your permission to use the articles and have given
full credit to you as the author and also included a link to your website
pages as requested.
The profile of PetClub UK has not changed since it was launched and
it has always been a commercial website. This would have been obvious
to anyone. I find your argument that we should remove the articles because
of a difference in interpretation between the UK and the US of a “pet
club” rather innocuous considering the time and effort it has
taken us to re-produce the articles on our site.
The onus is on you to investigate and decide whether to offer your permission,
which you obviously did at the time. As nothing has changed since then
I find your request to now remove the articles unacceptable. I would
assume that because of the time, money and effort we have expended on
PetClub UK in the last couple of years has improved our google searches
and rankings which is the reason it has now come to your attention.
I would also like to point out that the commercial side of PetClub UK
is purely UK only so would have no negative effect. Alongside the commercial
aspect of PetClub UK is the extensive pet care and pet information section
of the website. This offers reference and information to our visitors
and “pet club” members which is what a “pet club”
is by definition.
I would like to reach an amicable agreement to continue as we are, I
would welcome any suggestions of extra wording you would like inserted
into the articles or updated links you think would be relevant. Many
of our UK members have found your articles informative and helpful which
I understand to be the reason we were both happy for the content to
be on our website.
Please could you let me have your comments.
Kind regards
David Woolven
PetClub UK
|